# BIND 4.9.5 installed.
AC_DEFUN(AC_CHECK_NETLIBS,
-[AC_CHECK_FUNC(gethostbyname, ,
- AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, gethostbyname, ,
- AC_CHECK_LIB(resolv, gethostbyname)))
+[AC_CHECK_FUNC(getaddrinfo, ,
+ AC_CHECK_LIB(nsl, getaddrinfo, ,
+ AC_CHECK_LIB(resolv, getaddrinfo)))
AC_CHECK_FUNC(socket, ,
AC_CHECK_LIB(socket, socket))
])
+dnl --------------
+dnl CHECK FOR NDBM
+dnl --------------
+dnl
+dnl NMH_CHECK_DBM(include,library,action-if-found,action-if-not)
-# This checks for the function ruserpass.
-#
-# 1) first, check for ruserpass
-# 2) else, check for _ruserpass
-# 3) else, check for _ruserpass in libsocket
-# 4) else, build version of ruserpass in nmh/sbr
-AC_DEFUN(AC_CHECK_RUSERPASS,
-[AC_CHECK_FUNC(ruserpass, ,
- AC_CHECK_FUNC(_ruserpass, ,
- AC_CHECK_LIB(socket, _ruserpass)))
-if test x$ac_cv_func_ruserpass = xno; then
- if test x$ac_cv_func__ruserpass = xyes -o x$ac_cv_lib_socket__ruserpass = xyes; then
- AC_DEFINE(ruserpass, _ruserpass)
- else
- LIBOBJS="$LIBOBJS ruserpass.o"
- fi
+dnl Check for presence of dbm_open() in the specified library
+dnl and with the specified include file (if libname is the empty
+dnl string then don't try to link against any particular library).
+
+dnl We set nmh_ndbm_found to 'yes' or 'no'; if found we set
+dnl nmh_ndbmheader to the first arg and nmh_ndbm to the second.
+
+dnl If this macro accepted a list of include,library tuples
+dnl to test in order that would be cleaner than the current
+dnl nest of calls in configure.in.
+
+dnl We try to link our own code fragment (which includes the
+dnl headers in the same way slocal.c does) rather than
+dnl using AC_CHECK_LIB because on later versions of libdb
+dnl the dbm_open() function is provided via a #define and
+dnl we don't want to hardcode searching for the internal
+dnl function that lies behind it. (AC_CHECK_LIB works by
+dnl defining its own bogus prototype rather than pulling in
+dnl the right header files.)
+
+dnl An oddity (bug) of this macro is that if you haven't
+dnl done AC_PROG_CC or something that implies it before
+dnl using this macro autoconf complains about a recursive
+dnl expansion.
+
+AC_DEFUN(NMH_CHECK_NDBM,
+[
+if test "x$2" = "x"; then
+ nmh_libs=
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for dbm in $1])
+else
+ nmh_libs="-l$2 "
+ AC_MSG_CHECKING([for dbm in $1 and $2])
fi
-])
+
+dnl We don't try to cache the result, because that exceeds
+dnl my autoconf skills -- feel free to put it in :-> -- PMM
+
+nmh_saved_libs="$LIBS"
+LIBS="$nmh_libs $5 $LIBS"
+AC_LINK_IFELSE(AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[
+#define DB_DBM_HSEARCH 1
+#include <$1>
+]],
+[[dbm_open("",0,0);]]),[nmh_ndbm_found=yes],[nmh_ndbm_found=no])
+LIBS="$nmh_saved_libs"
+
+if test "$nmh_ndbm_found" = "yes"; then
+ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
+ nmh_ndbmheader="$1"
+ nmh_ndbm="$2"
+ $3
+else
+ AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
+ $4
+ :
+fi
+])dnl
+
+dnl ----------------
+dnl CHECK FOR d_type
+dnl ----------------
+dnl
+dnl From Jim Meyering.
+dnl
+dnl Check whether struct dirent has a member named d_type.
+dnl
+
+# Copyright (C) 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software
+# Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+# gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+# with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
+
+AC_DEFUN([CHECK_TYPE_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE],
+ [AC_REQUIRE([AC_HEADER_DIRENT])dnl
+ AC_CACHE_CHECK([for d_type member in directory struct],
+ jm_cv_struct_dirent_d_type,
+ [AC_TRY_LINK(dnl
+ [
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#ifdef HAVE_DIRENT_H
+# include <dirent.h>
+#else /* not HAVE_DIRENT_H */
+# define dirent direct
+# ifdef HAVE_SYS_NDIR_H
+# include <sys/ndir.h>
+# endif /* HAVE_SYS_NDIR_H */
+# ifdef HAVE_SYS_DIR_H
+# include <sys/dir.h>
+# endif /* HAVE_SYS_DIR_H */
+# ifdef HAVE_NDIR_H
+# include <ndir.h>
+# endif /* HAVE_NDIR_H */
+#endif /* HAVE_DIRENT_H */
+ ],
+ [struct dirent dp; dp.d_type = 0;],
+
+ jm_cv_struct_dirent_d_type=yes,
+ jm_cv_struct_dirent_d_type=no)
+ ]
+ )
+ if test $jm_cv_struct_dirent_d_type = yes; then
+ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE, 1,
+ [Define if there is a member named d_type in the struct describing
+ directory headers.])
+ fi
+ ]
+)