1 From: Boris Kraut <krt@nurfuerspam.de>
\r
2 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:36:59 +0200
\r
4 Message-ID: <20130402013659.dPqewu@silberbruch>
\r
8 To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
\r
9 Subject: [.plan] Zitat des Tages
\r
12 > However, it's also seems clear to me that this is a recipe
\r
13 > for trouble for the semantic web. Surely all real-world data
\r
14 > that concerns non-trivial applications such as science and
\r
15 > electronic health records, or any kind of human activity
\r
16 > _must_ take time into account? Which ever hack you make to
\r
17 > account for time, it has to propagate through all your
\r
18 > ontologies. An ontology that treats the world as time-slices
\r
19 > can't interoperate with one that has a standard view of
\r
20 > objects and processes. It may be just about workable, but
\r
21 > I can't see it being anything other than tremendously
\r
22 > complicated. We'll essentially end up with layering 3-place
\r
23 > relations on top of RDF in an extremely inelegant way.
\r
projects / krt-msg / blob