From: Boris Kraut <krt@nurfuerspam.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:36:59 +0200
Category: 
Message-ID: <20130402013659.dPqewu@silberbruch>
Organization: 
Keywords: 
Comments: 
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: [.plan] Zitat des Tages

Chris Mungall:
> However, it's also seems clear to me that this is a recipe
> for trouble for the semantic web. Surely all real-world data
> that concerns non-trivial applications such as science and
> electronic health records, or any kind of human activity
> _must_ take time into account? Which ever hack you make to
> account for time, it has to propagate through all your
> ontologies. An ontology that treats the world as time-slices
> can't interoperate with one that has a standard view of
> objects and processes. It may be just about workable, but
> I can't see it being anything other than tremendously
> complicated. We'll essentially end up with layering 3-place
> relations on top of RDF in an extremely inelegant way.