Upped the version number to 1.0.3. If we don't do this, then when people report

bugs against 1.0.2, we won't know "which" 1.0.2 they're talking about (since the
development source is publically available via CVS).  I think the Linux kernel
version numbers are a good model, so the next time we roll a tarball, it should
be version 1.0.4 (or higher -- anyhow, an even-numbered version).

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 13eaf81..a5b07d5 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+Fri Oct 29 13:42:51 1999 Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net>
+
+       * Upped the version number to 1.0.3.  If we don't do this, then
+       when people report bugs against 1.0.2, we won't know "which" 1.0.2
+       they're talking about (since the development source is publically
+       available via CVS).  I think the Linux kernel version numbers are
+       a good model, so the next time we roll a tarball, it should be
+       version 1.0.4 (or higher -- anyhow, an even-numbered version).
+

 Fri Oct 29 06:41:08 1999 Doug Morris <doug@mhost.com>
 
        * Released nmh-1.0.2.
 Fri Oct 29 06:41:08 1999 Doug Morris <doug@mhost.com>
 
        * Released nmh-1.0.2.

diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION
index 6d7de6e..21e8796 100644 (file)
--- a/VERSION
+++ b/VERSION
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1.0.2
+1.0.3