+Tue Jul 18 19:36:59 EDT 2000 Kimmo Suominen <kim@tac.nyc.ny.us>
+
+ * Added the obvious answer to Dan's question in README.developers;
+ I'm not sure why we don't just have this discussion in e-mail.
+
Mon Jul 17 19:10:36 2000 Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net>
* Clarified and made some corrections to Kimmo's README.developers
The reason that the commits need to be split up is that the RCS Id strings
in the files change when you commit, which can apparently mess up the
-dependencies. [How? -- Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net>] If this were
-not the case, you could commit with a single make followed by a
+dependencies. [How? -- Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net> // CVS
+updates the strings to have the new version number, the modification time
+of the file gets updated by the OS. -- Kimmo Suominen <kim@tac.nyc.ny.us>]
+If this were not the case, you could commit with a single make followed by a
cvs commit acconfig.h aclocal.m4 config.h.in configure.in configure stamp-h.in.
+[But since we have the RCS Id strings in the files, isn't it useless to even
+mention this? The fix would be to remove the strings, and I don't think that
+would be good. -- Kimmo Suominen <kim@tac.nyc.ny.us>]
If you haven't changed all the files noted above, just commit the ones you have,
in the stated order (for instance, configure.in, then configure, then