+Wed Sep 6 22:40:03 2000 Shantonu Sen <ssen@mit.edu>
+
+ * Tracked down the problem in the new dtimep where time
+ zones were being radically misreported. It was because the
+ parser knew about military time zones (such as M or E) but in
+ some cases did not know about the textual representation of
+ some zones (like MET). When it encountered one of these, the
+ date parser misread MET as the military time zone T (well, first
+ zone M, then E, and finally T). I took military zones out, and
+ things seem much better. Also, the default behavior of parsing
+ time zones appears to default to GMT in the absence of better
+ info, which is less bogus than assuming the mail came from the
+ current time zone, which was the behavior in 1.04.
+
Thu Aug 10 13:22:13 2000 Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net>
* Decided that limiting the message number columns to 3 on my