Upped the version number to 1.0.3. If we don't do this, then when people report
authorDan Harkless <dan@harkless.org>
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 20:42:13 +0000 (20:42 +0000)
committerDan Harkless <dan@harkless.org>
Fri, 29 Oct 1999 20:42:13 +0000 (20:42 +0000)
bugs against 1.0.2, we won't know "which" 1.0.2 they're talking about (since the
development source is publically available via CVS).  I think the Linux kernel
version numbers are a good model, so the next time we roll a tarball, it should
be version 1.0.4 (or higher -- anyhow, an even-numbered version).


No differences found