-The reason that the commits need to be split up is that the RCS Id strings
-in the files change when you commit, which can apparently mess up the
-dependencies. [How? -- Dan Harkless <dan-nmh@dilvish.speed.net> // CVS
-updates the strings to have the new version number, the modification time
-of the file gets updated by the OS. -- Kimmo Suominen <kim@tac.nyc.ny.us>]
-If this were not the case, you could commit with a single make followed by a
-cvs commit acconfig.h aclocal.m4 config.h.in configure.in configure stamp-h.in.
-[But since we have the RCS Id strings in the files, isn't it useless to even
-mention this? The fix would be to remove the strings, and I don't think that
-would be good. -- Kimmo Suominen <kim@tac.nyc.ny.us>]
+The reason that the commits need to be split up is that the timestamps on the
+files change when the commits are done and the RCS Ids change. If one committed
+all the files in one fell swoop (in the above relative order), timestamps would
+cause unnecessary autoconf regeneration on 'make's after the commit, which would
+waste your time and would cause your local stamp-h.in to be out-of-sync with the
+one checked into CVS (not the end of the world, but...).